to simply put it: splendid image

"photography being a very subjective medium, means maybe we do get it right all the time depending on who's looking at our images"

...really well put

"...very much insistent that I airbrush all their images, if they were for commercial use I would have understood why, but they weren't!!"

...sometimes we want to see our potential...besides reality can be overrated and sometimes boring

keep up the good work
cheers

very good work! I wish that more people had seen it. Happy 50th. mal

A gourgeous image, I love it

Lovely shot! Congratulations and here's wishing you infinite creativity to produce many more great shots!

Mr. Deen
all that text above is just a lot rubbish with double-standards
as you seem to get off on having a port folio with only shallow niceties as feedback! Any critical feedback is being deleted very quickly, I've noticed.
How you ever gonna learn if you too arrogant to comment on the

For example: I agreed with the person who said that the image with the coloured stones was no more efford then a basic GCSE photography project.
Why did you delete that? It is someones opinion and I feel it was a fair comment. Anyone with integrity would have lived and learned.

This is in response to Professional. I really couldn't be bothered to type up another pointless response that i've copied this from one I posted earlier. Which is applicable to you. So I'll add these few bits on:
1. I know for a fact that HDR's are not covered at GCSE level.
2. There is nothing to be learned from the rants posted by these characters and yourself included. And please next time look up the meaning of Critical!

This is in response to Medicineworkings.

I never shot using a Pinhole camera’s, but I did until 3 years ago shoot film. Spent over 5 years developing and printing my own black and white prints at the Islington Art’s Factory, Drill Hall, City Lit & the Camera Club in Kennington. And I’ve got all my mounted prints to prove it. And if you were versed in the medium, then you would be aware that Photoshop is the digital dark room of the 21st century, and all it’s functionalities are based on traditional (old school) developing and printing methods.

There is nothing critical about the comments posted by M4t, as they bear no relevance to the images in question. And even though I noted in my notes that these are HDR images, you all keeping missing the mark. Your critique, assessment, evaluation, analysis or whatever has to be on their merits has HDR’s.

If you guys can “Talk the talk” then you really have to be able to “walk the walk”. Either by showing at least a modicum of knowledge regarding the photography medium, or have the guile and conviction of positing your images to back it up.